Table of contents
- Overview of the trial program
- Who is being studied
- Trial phases and study design
- Main endpoints being measured
- Trials by condition
- What these studies may mean for patients
Overview of the trial program
The trial data show a broad research program for Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide, with studies in neuroendocrine tumors, meningioma, neuroblastoma, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.[1] Most studies are interventional, which means the researchers give a treatment and then measure what happens.[1]
Across the trials, the main goals are to study efficacy, safety, tolerability, and radiation dose to organs and tumors.[1] Several studies compare Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide with standard care, active surveillance, or other treatment strategies.[1]
Who is being studied
The largest group of trials includes patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), including advanced disease, well-differentiated tumors, and tumors with somatostatin receptor positivity.[1] Some studies focus on midgut neuroendocrine tumors, small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms, or patients with liver metastases.[1]
Other studies include people with recurrent or refractory meningioma, children with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma, adolescents with GEP-NETs or pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, and patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.[1] One study also includes children and adolescents with recurrent or relapsed solid tumors that express somatostatin receptors.[1]
Trial phases and study design
The studies span Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 research.[1] Phase 1 trials are used mainly to define dose, safety, or tolerability, while Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials look more closely at how well the treatment works in larger groups.[1]
Some studies are randomized, meaning patients are assigned by chance to different treatment groups.[1] Others compare Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide with active surveillance, best supportive care, or standard treatment choices.[1]
Main endpoints being measured
The most common endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), which is the time before the cancer gets worse or the patient dies from any cause.[1] One adjuvant study uses relapse-free survival (RFS), which measures time from randomization to relapse or death.[1]
Other studies measure disease control rate, overall survival, response rate, and time to deterioration in health-related quality of life.[1] Safety endpoints include adverse events, serious adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, laboratory toxicities, and hematologic toxicity.[1]
Some trials also measure absorbed radiation dose in organs such as the kidney and bone marrow, or tumor uptake on imaging tests like PET-CT or SPECT/CT.[1]
Trials by condition
Neuroendocrine tumors are the main focus of the trial program.[1] Several Phase 3 studies test Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide as first-line treatment in advanced GEP-NETs or as part of treatment strategies after progression.[1] Other studies look at retreatment, adjuvant use after surgery for stage III small intestinal disease, or less intensive schedules for slowly progressive midgut tumors.[1]
For meningioma, the trials ask whether Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide can help control recurrent or refractory disease, including grades 2 and 3.[1] The main outcomes here are progression-free survival, often assessed by MRI-based criteria.[1]
In children and adolescents, the studies include recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma and other relapsed solid tumors with somatostatin receptor expression.[1] These trials focus on finding the maximum tolerated dose, early response, safety, and quality of life.[1]
One study in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer examines Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab, first to define the dose and then to test overall survival.[1]
What these studies may mean for patients
These trials show that Lutetium (177Lu) Oxodotreotide is being tested in both earlier and more advanced research settings.[1] Some studies ask whether it should be used earlier in treatment, while others test whether it can help after disease progression or in special groups such as children and adolescents.[1]
For patients, the key point is that trial participation depends on the cancer type, tumor features such as somatostatin receptor positivity, age group, and previous treatment history.[1] The studies are designed to answer practical questions about benefit, safety, and how to measure response in different diseases.[1]


