Table of contents
- Clinical trials overview
- Conditions studied
- How the studies are designed
- Main outcomes measured
- Who can participate
- Summary of the listed trials
Clinical trials overview
The listed studies of VOROLANIB are all Phase 3 interventional trials, which means they test a treatment in people and compare results in a larger group.[1][2][3] Each trial is authorised and looks at whether VOROLANIB can give the same vision benefit as aflibercept.[1][2][3]
The three listed studies are called LUCIA, CAPRI, and COMO.[1][2][3] They all use the same general goal: to compare vision change over 56 weeks.[1][2][3]
Conditions studied
One trial studies wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), a condition that can harm the part of the eye needed for sharp central vision.[1] The other two trials study diabetic macular edema (DME), which is swelling in the macula caused by diabetes and can blur vision.[2][3]
These conditions are important because they can reduce the ability to read, drive, or recognize faces clearly.[1][2][3] The studies focus on whether treatment can improve or preserve vision in these eye diseases.[1][2][3]
How the studies are designed
All three trials are described as randomized and double-masked.[1][2][3] Randomized means people are assigned by chance to a treatment group, and double-masked means neither the participant nor the study staff knows which treatment is given.[1][2][3]
The comparison treatment in each study is aflibercept, listed as Eylea in the trial data.[1][2][3] This design helps researchers see whether VOROLANIB performs as well as the current comparison treatment.[1][2][3]
The trials use intravitreal treatment, which means the study drug is given into the eye.[1][2][3] This is relevant because all studies are about eye disease and vision outcomes.[1][2][3]
Main outcomes measured
The main outcome in every listed trial is whether VOROLANIB can produce the same vision benefits as aflibercept over 56 weeks.[1][2][3] A primary endpoint is the main result the study plans to measure first.[1][2][3]
The trials also measure best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), which means how well a person can see with the best possible glasses or contact lenses.[1][2][3] In simple terms, this tells researchers how much the treatment helps a person see more clearly.[1][2][3]
In the trial summaries, the goal is described as evaluating the efficacy of VOROLANIB inserts compared with aflibercept treatment.[1][2][3] Efficacy means how well a treatment works in a study setting.[1][2][3]
Who can participate
The trial data do not give full eligibility rules such as age limits, test results, or previous treatments.[1][2][3] Based on the listed conditions, participants are people with either wet age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema, depending on the study.[1][2][3]
The studies are large enough to include 400 people in one trial and 240 people in each of the two diabetic macular edema trials.[1][2][3] This size helps researchers compare results across groups more reliably.[1][2][3]
Summary of the listed trials
The table below brings together the most important details from the three listed studies.[1][2][3]
| Trial ID | Title | Phase | Condition | Status | Enrollment | Main endpoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT06683742 | LUCIA | Phase 3 | Wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) | Authorised | 400 | Same vision benefits as aflibercept over 56 weeks |
| 2025-523938-10-00 | CAPRI | Phase 3 | Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) | Authorised | 240 | Same vision benefits as aflibercept over 56 weeks |
| 2025-523937-25-00 | COMO | Phase 3 | Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) | Authorised | 240 | Same vision benefits as aflibercept over 56 weeks |




